Athlon 300U vs Xeon E5-2650 v4

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2650 v4
2016
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
8.81
+247%

Xeon E5-2650 v4 outperforms Athlon 300U by a whopping 247% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Athlon 300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking8611724
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.12no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5AMD Athlon
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,166no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Athlon 300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads244
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus typeQPIPCIe 3.0
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier2224
L1 cache64 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache3 MB1 MB
L3 cache30 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size306.18 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature80 °Cno data
Number of transistors4700 Million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Athlon 300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011AM4
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Athlon 300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Athlon 300U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Athlon 300U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Athlon 300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size1.5 TB64 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Athlon 300U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4012

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2650 v4 8.81
+247%
Athlon 300U 2.54

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2650 v4 13591
+246%
Athlon 300U 3923

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.81 2.54
Recency 20 June 2016 6 January 2019
Physical cores 12 2
Threads 24 4
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon E5-2650 v4 has a 246.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

Athlon 300U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 600% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2650 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 300U in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2650 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon 300U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Athlon 300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
Xeon E5-2650 v4
AMD Athlon 300U
Athlon 300U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 1527 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2650 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 456 votes

Rate Athlon 300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2650 v4 or Athlon 300U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.