Ryzen Threadripper 1930X vs Xeon E5-2640

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2640 and Ryzen Threadripper 1930X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1421not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.75no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.94no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$162no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2640 and Ryzen Threadripper 1930X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads12no data
Base clock speed2.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rate7.2 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache15360 KB (shared)32768 KB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size435 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,270 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2640 and Ryzen Threadripper 1930X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011SP3r2
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Ryzen Threadripper 1930X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2640 and Ryzen Threadripper 1930X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Ryzen Threadripper 1930X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Ryzen Threadripper 1930X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size384 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Ryzen Threadripper 1930X.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 6 12
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon E5-2640 has 31.6% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper 1930X, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2640 and Ryzen Threadripper 1930X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2640 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Threadripper 1930X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2640 and Ryzen Threadripper 1930X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2640
Xeon E5-2640
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1930X
Ryzen Threadripper 1930X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1094 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1930X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2640 or Ryzen Threadripper 1930X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.