Pentium 3560M vs Xeon E5-2640 v4

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Pentium 3560M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	1003	2642
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.73	no data
Market segment	Server	Laptop
Series	Intel Xeon E5	Intel Pentium
Power efficiency	8.24	2.16
Designer	Intel	Intel
Architecture codename	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date	20 June 2016 (8 years ago)	14 April 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$939	$134

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Pentium 3560M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	10 (Deca-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	20	2
Base clock speed	2.4 GHz	2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.4 GHz	2.4 GHz
Bus type	QPI	no data
Bus rate	2 × 8 GT/s	5 GT/s
Multiplier	24	no data
L1 cache	no data	128 KB
L2 cache	2.5 MB	512 KB
L3 cache	25 MB	2 MB
Chip lithography	14 nm	22 nm
Die size	246.24 mm2	130 mm2
Maximum core temperature	76 °C	100 °C
Number of transistors	3200 Million	960 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Pentium 3560M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2 (Multiprocessor)	1
Socket	FCLGA2011	FCPGA946
Power consumption (TDP)	90 Watt	37 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Pentium 3560M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® AVX2	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI	+	-
AVX	+	-
vPro	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	-
TSX	+	-
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	+
Flex Memory Access	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	+	no data
PAE	46 Bit	no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Pentium 3560M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	-
EDB	+	+
Secure Key	+	+
OS Guard	+	no data
Anti-Theft	no data	-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Pentium 3560M are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-d	+	-
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Pentium 3560M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133	DDR3
Maximum memory size	1.5 TB	32 GB
Max memory channels	4	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	68.3 GB/s	25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support	+	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	no data	Intel HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel Processors
Quick Sync Video	-	+
Graphics max frequency	no data	1.1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Pentium 3560M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	no data	3
eDP	no data	+
DisplayPort	-	+
HDMI	-	+
VGA	no data	+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Pentium 3560M.

PCIe version	3.0	2.0
PCI Express lanes	40	16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	7.79	0.84
Recency	20 June 2016	14 April 2014
Physical cores	10	2
Threads	20	2
Chip lithography	14 nm	22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	90 Watt	37 Watt

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---