Xeon Gold 6348 vs E5-2620 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2620 v4
2016
8 cores / 16 threads, 85 Watt
5.83
Xeon Gold 6348
2021
28 cores / 56 threads, 235 Watt
32.64
+460%

Xeon Gold 6348 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v4 by a whopping 460% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Xeon Gold 6348 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1125123
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.37no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency6.5013.15
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$417no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Xeon Gold 6348 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads1656
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB42 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size246.24 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data80 °C
Number of transistors3200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Xeon Gold 6348 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt235 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Xeon Gold 6348. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Xeon Gold 6348 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Xeon Gold 6348 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Xeon Gold 6348. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1.5 TB6 TB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth68.3 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Xeon Gold 6348.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4064

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2620 v4 5.83
Xeon Gold 6348 32.64
+460%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2620 v4 9259
Xeon Gold 6348 51843
+460%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.83 32.64
Recency 20 June 2016 6 April 2021
Physical cores 8 28
Threads 16 56
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 235 Watt

Xeon E5-2620 v4 has 176.5% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6348, on the other hand, has a 459.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 250% more physical cores and 250% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Gold 6348 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2620 v4 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Xeon Gold 6348, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
Xeon E5-2620 v4
Intel Xeon Gold 6348
Xeon Gold 6348

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 100 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2620 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 16 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6348 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2620 v4 or Xeon Gold 6348, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.