Celeron N2840 vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Celeron N2840 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesVIAIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameCNQ (2011)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date17 May 2011 (13 years ago)22 May 2014 (10 years ago)
Current priceno data$287

Detailed specifications

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Celeron N2840 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.2 GHz2.16 GHz
Boost clock speed1.46 GHz2.58 GHz
Bus support1333 MHzno data
L1 cache512 KB56K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography40 nm22 nm
Die size132 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Celeron N2840 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGAFCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)27.5 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Celeron N2840. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Smart Connectno data+
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Celeron N2840 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Celeron N2840 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Celeron N2840. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.32 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data792 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Celeron N2840 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Celeron N2840.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 1615
+7%
Celeron N2840 1510

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 outperforms Celeron N2840 by 7% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 May 2011 22 May 2014
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 40 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 7 Watt

We couldn't decide between VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Celeron N2840. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Celeron N2840, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
Nano QuadCore L4700
Intel Celeron N2840
Celeron N2840

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 577 votes

Rate Celeron N2840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 or Celeron N2840, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.