Xeon L5420 vs E5-2620 v3

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2620 v3
2014
6 cores / 12 threads, 85 Watt
4.92
+264%

Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Xeon L5420 by a whopping 264% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Xeon L5420 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12302240
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency5.482.56
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)no data
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)1 January 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Xeon L5420 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)no data
Threads12no data
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)no data
L3 cache15 MB (shared)12 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size356 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature73 °C57 °C
Number of transistors2,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.35V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Xeon L5420 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA2011LGA771
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt50 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Xeon L5420. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching++
PAE46 Bitno data
FSB parityno data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Xeon L5420 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Xeon L5420 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Xeon L5420. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866no data
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth59 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Xeon L5420.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2620 v3 4.92
+264%
Xeon L5420 1.35

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2620 v3 7808
+264%
Xeon L5420 2143

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2620 v3 949
+186%
Xeon L5420 332

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2620 v3 4131
+350%
Xeon L5420 917

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.92 1.35
Recency 8 September 2014 1 January 2008
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 50 Watt

Xeon E5-2620 v3 has a 264.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 104.5% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon L5420, on the other hand, has 70% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2620 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon L5420 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Xeon L5420, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Intel Xeon L5420
Xeon L5420

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 2745 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2620 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 149 votes

Rate Xeon L5420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2620 v3 or Xeon L5420, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.