Atom x7-Z8700 vs Xeon E5-2620 v3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2620 v3
2014
6 cores / 12 threads, 85 Watt
4.92
+493%

Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Atom x7-Z8700 by a whopping 493% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Atom x7-Z8700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12422594
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno data7x Intel Atom
Power efficiency5.48no data
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Cherry Trail (2015−2016)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)2 March 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Atom x7-Z8700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads124
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache15 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size356 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature73 °C90 °C
Number of transistors2,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Atom x7-Z8700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011UTFCBGA1380
Power consumption (TDP)85 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Atom x7-Z8700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Atom x7-Z8700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-+
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Atom x7-Z8700 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Atom x7-Z8700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866DDR3
Maximum memory size768 GB8 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth59 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (200 - 600 MHz)
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Graphics max frequencyno data600 MHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Atom x7-Z8700 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Atom x7-Z8700 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data3840x2160
Max resolution over eDPno data2560x1600

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Atom x7-Z8700.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes402
USB revisionno data3.0
Number of USB portsno data3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2620 v3 4.92
+493%
Atom x7-Z8700 0.83

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2620 v3 7813
+489%
Atom x7-Z8700 1326

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2620 v3 951
+434%
Atom x7-Z8700 178

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2620 v3 4129
+708%
Atom x7-Z8700 511

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.92 0.83
Recency 8 September 2014 2 March 2015
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm

Xeon E5-2620 v3 has a 492.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Atom x7-Z8700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon E5-2620 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x7-Z8700 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2620 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Atom x7-Z8700 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Atom x7-Z8700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Intel Atom x7-Z8700
Atom x7-Z8700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 2763 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2620 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 21 vote

Rate Atom x7-Z8700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2620 v3 or Atom x7-Z8700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.