Phenom II X2 550 vs Xeon E5-2620 v2

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2620 v2
2013
6 cores / 12 threads, 80 Watt
3.95
+434%
Phenom II X2 550
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 80 Watt
0.74

Xeon E5-2620 v2 outperforms Phenom II X2 550 by a whopping 434% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2620 v2 and Phenom II X2 550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14322666
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.410.02
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency4.650.87
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EP (2013)Callisto (2009−2010)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)4 November 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$417$133

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2620 v2 has 6950% better value for money than Phenom II X2 550.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2620 v2 and Phenom II X2 550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus rate7.2 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache15 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size160 mm2258 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million758 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2620 v2 and Phenom II X2 550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011AM3
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2620 v2 and Phenom II X2 550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2620 v2 and Phenom II X2 550 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2620 v2 and Phenom II X2 550 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2620 v2 and Phenom II X2 550. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2620 v2 and Phenom II X2 550.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2620 v2 3.95
+434%
Phenom II X2 550 0.74

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2620 v2 6246
+435%
Phenom II X2 550 1167

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.95 0.74
Recency 1 September 2013 4 November 2009
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm

Xeon E5-2620 v2 has a 433.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 104.5% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon E5-2620 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X2 550 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2620 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Phenom II X2 550 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2620 v2 and Phenom II X2 550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
Xeon E5-2620 v2
AMD Phenom II X2 550
Phenom II X2 550

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 689 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2620 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 126 votes

Rate Phenom II X2 550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2620 v2 or Phenom II X2 550, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.