Atom x7213RE vs Xeon E5-2618L v4
Aggregate performance score
Xeon E5-2618L v4 outperforms Atom x7213RE by a whopping 390% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1168 | 2378 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.98 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Xeon E5 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 10.08 | 17.16 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Amston Lake (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 20 June 2016 (9 years ago) | 8 April 2024 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $779 | $42 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Atom x7213RE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 20 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Bus type | QPI | no data |
| Bus rate | 2 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 22 | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2.5 MB | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 25 MB | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 246.24 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 3200 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Atom x7213RE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | no data | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 9 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Atom x7213RE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Atom x7213RE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Atom x7213RE are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Atom x7213RE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 1,536 GB | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 16EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Atom x7213RE.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | 9 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 7.05 | 1.44 |
| Recency | 20 June 2016 | 8 April 2024 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 2 |
| Threads | 20 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 9 Watt |
Xeon E5-2618L v4 has a 389.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 400% more physical cores and 900% more threads.
Atom x7213RE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.
The Intel Xeon E5-2618L v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom x7213RE in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon E5-2618L v4 is a mobile workstation processor while Atom x7213RE is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
