Atom x7213RE vs FX-7600P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-7600P
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.45
+0.7%

FX-7600P outperforms Atom x7213RE by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23662377
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Kaverino data
Power efficiency4.4417.14
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesIntel
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Amston Lake (2024−2025)
Release date4 June 2014 (11 years ago)8 April 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$42

Detailed specifications

FX-7600P and Atom x7213RE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus rateBGA (FP3)no data
L1 cacheno data96 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB2 MB (shared)
L3 cacheno data6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm10 nm
Die size245 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,410 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on FX-7600P and Atom x7213RE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP3Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-7600P and Atom x7213RE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-7600P and Atom x7213RE are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-7600P and Atom x7213RE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR4, DDR5
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics 16EU
iGPU core count8no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-7600P and Atom x7213RE integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-7600P and Atom x7213RE integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-7600P and Atom x7213RE.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes89

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

FX-7600P 1.45
+0.7%
Atom x7213RE 1.44

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

FX-7600P 2557
+0.7%
Samples: 140
Atom x7213RE 2538
Samples: 7

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.45 1.44
Recency 4 June 2014 8 April 2024
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 9 Watt

FX-7600P has a 0.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Atom x7213RE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 288.9% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between AMD FX-7600P and Intel Atom x7213RE.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-7600P
FX-7600P
Intel Atom x7213RE
Atom x7213RE

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 12 votes

Rate FX-7600P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom x7213RE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors FX-7600P and Atom x7213RE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.