A10-6700 vs Xeon E5-2403

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2403
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 80 Watt
1.49
A10-6700
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.95
+30.9%

A10-6700 outperforms Xeon E5-2403 by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2403 and A10-6700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21471939
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.28no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.762.84
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EN (2012)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date14 May 2012 (12 years ago)1 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$230no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2403 and A10-6700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.8 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus rate6.4 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4096 KB
L3 cache10240 KB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size294 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data71 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data71 °C
Number of transistors1,270 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2403 and A10-6700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1356FM2
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2403 and A10-6700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMA-FMA4
AVX+AVX
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2403 and A10-6700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2403 and A10-6700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2403 and A10-6700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1866
Maximum memory size384 GBno data
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth25 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 8670D
Number of pipelinesno data384
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2403 and A10-6700 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5-2403 and A10-6700 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2403 and A10-6700.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes24no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2403 1.49
A10-6700 1.95
+30.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2403 2367
A10-6700 3105
+31.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.49 1.95
Recency 14 May 2012 1 June 2013
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 65 Watt

A10-6700 has a 30.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 23.1% lower power consumption.

The A10-6700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2403 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2403 is a server/workstation processor while A10-6700 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2403 and A10-6700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2403
Xeon E5-2403
AMD A10-6700
A10-6700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 2 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2403 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 254 votes

Rate A10-6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2403 or A10-6700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.