Xeon E5-2430L vs A10-6700

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-6700
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.95
Xeon E5-2430L
2012
6 cores / 12 threads, 60 Watt
3.49
+79%

Xeon E5-2430L outperforms A10-6700 by an impressive 79% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-6700 and Xeon E5-2430L processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19531544
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency2.845.50
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Sandy Bridge-EN (2012)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)14 May 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A10-6700 and Xeon E5-2430L basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus rateno data7.2 GT/s
L1 cache192 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB15360 KB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm2294 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million1,270 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A10-6700 and Xeon E5-2430L compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFM2FCLGA1356
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt60 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-6700 and Xeon E5-2430L. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX+
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+

Security technologies

A10-6700 and Xeon E5-2430L technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-6700 and Xeon E5-2430L are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-6700 and Xeon E5-2430L. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data384 GB
Max memory channels23
Maximum memory bandwidthno data32 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8670Dno data
จำนวนพาธไลน์384no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-6700 and Xeon E5-2430L integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-6700 and Xeon E5-2430L integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-6700 and Xeon E5-2430L.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data24

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-6700 1.95
Xeon E5-2430L 3.49
+79%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-6700 3105
Xeon E5-2430L 5539
+78.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.95 3.49
Recency 1 June 2013 14 May 2012
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 12
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 60 Watt

A10-6700 has an age advantage of 1 year.

Xeon E5-2430L, on the other hand, has a 79% higher aggregate performance score, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and 8.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2430L is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-6700 in performance tests.

Note that A10-6700 is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-2430L is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-6700 and Xeon E5-2430L, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-6700
A10-6700
Intel Xeon E5-2430L
Xeon E5-2430L

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 257 votes

Rate A10-6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2430L on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-6700 or Xeon E5-2430L, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.