Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U vs Xeon E5-1650 v2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-1650 v2
2013
6 cores / 12 threads, 130 Watt
5.87
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
15.38
+162%

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U outperforms Xeon E5-1650 v2 by a whopping 162% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1650 v2 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1115454
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.55no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency4.2751.98
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-E (2013)Hawk Point (2024)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$917no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1650 v2 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1216
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate0 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm4 nm
Die size160 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1650 v2 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2011FP7
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1650 v2 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1650 v2 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1650 v2 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1650 v2 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1650 v2 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-1650 v2 5.87
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U 15.38
+162%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-1650 v2 9326
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U 24431
+162%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.87 15.38
Recency 1 September 2013 16 April 2024
Physical cores 6 8
Threads 12 16
Chip lithography 22 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U has a 162% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, a 450% more advanced lithography process, and 364.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-1650 v2 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1650 v2 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2
Xeon E5-1650 v2
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 485 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1650 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 21 vote

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1650 v2 or Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.