Atom x7-Z8750 vs Xeon E5-1410

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-1410
2012
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
2.77
+274%

Xeon E5-1410 outperforms Atom x7-Z8750 by a whopping 274% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19182920
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno data7x Intel Atom
Power efficiency1.46no data
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EN (2012)Cherry Trail (2015−2016)
Release date14 May 2012 (13 years ago)1 April 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$37

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1410 and Atom x7-Z8750 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.8 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.56 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache10240 KB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size294 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors1,270 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.6V-1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1410 and Atom x7-Z8750 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
Socket1356UTFCBGA1380
Power consumption (TDP)80 WattW

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1410 and Atom x7-Z8750. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1410 and Atom x7-Z8750 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Bootno data+
Identity Protection-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1410 and Atom x7-Z8750 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1410 and Atom x7-Z8750. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size375 GB8 GB
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell) (400 - 600 MHz)
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Graphics max frequencyno data600 MHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-1410 and Atom x7-Z8750 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E5-1410 and Atom x7-Z8750 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data3840x2160
Max resolution over eDPno data2560x1600

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1410 and Atom x7-Z8750.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes242
USB revisionno data3.0
Number of USB portsno data3

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon E5-1410 2.77
+274%
Atom x7-Z8750 0.74

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon E5-1410 4852
+275%
Samples: 13
Atom x7-Z8750 1294
Samples: 101

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.77 0.74
Recency 14 May 2012 1 April 2016
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm

Xeon E5-1410 has a 274.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Atom x7-Z8750, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Xeon E5-1410 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom x7-Z8750 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-1410 is a server/workstation processor while Atom x7-Z8750 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1410
Xeon E5-1410
Intel Atom x7-Z8750
Atom x7-Z8750

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 6 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 24 votes

Rate Atom x7-Z8750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon E5-1410 and Atom x7-Z8750, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.