Xeon E5-2620 v2 vs E3-1535M v6

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1535M v6
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
5.19
+28.5%

E3-1535M v6 outperforms E5-2620 v2 by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1535M v6 and Xeon E5-2620 v2 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking11321349
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.314.00
Market segmentMobile workstationServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E3no data
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)1 September 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$623$417
Current price$4090 (6.6x MSRP)$102 (0.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2620 v2 has 1190% better value for money than Xeon E3-1535M v6.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1535M v6 and Xeon E5-2620 v2 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz2.6 GHz
L1 cache256 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB15 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data160 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C71 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1535M v6 and Xeon E5-2620 v2 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketBGA-1440FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1535M v6 and Xeon E5-2620 v2. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® AVX
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+-
SIPP+no data
Smart Response+no data
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data46 Bit
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1535M v6 and Xeon E5-2620 v2 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1535M v6 and Xeon E5-2620 v2 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1535M v6 and Xeon E5-2620 v2. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GB768 GB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth37.5 GB/s51.2 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics P630no data
Max video memory1.7 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1535M v6 and Xeon E5-2620 v2 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1535M v6 and Xeon E5-2620 v2 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@30Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1535M v6 and Xeon E5-2620 v2 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1535M v6 and Xeon E5-2620 v2.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1640

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1535M v6 5.19
+28.5%
Xeon E5-2620 v2 4.04

E3-1535M v6 outperforms E5-2620 v2 by 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E3-1535M v6 8021
+28.5%
Xeon E5-2620 v2 6244

E3-1535M v6 outperforms E5-2620 v2 by 28% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E3-1535M v6 1228
+198%
Xeon E5-2620 v2 412

E3-1535M v6 outperforms E5-2620 v2 by 198% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E3-1535M v6 3823
+80.3%
Xeon E5-2620 v2 2120

E3-1535M v6 outperforms E5-2620 v2 by 80% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.19 4.04
Recency 3 January 2017 1 September 2013
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 8 12
Cost $623 $417
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 80 Watt

The Xeon E3-1535M v6 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2620 v2 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1535M v6 is a mobile workstation processor while Xeon E5-2620 v2 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1535M v6 and Xeon E5-2620 v2, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6
Xeon E3-1535M v6
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
Xeon E5-2620 v2

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 102 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1535M v6 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 682 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2620 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1535M v6 or Xeon E5-2620 v2, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.