Xeon X5680 vs E3-1275 v6

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1275 v6
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 73 Watt
6.01
+36%

E3-1275 v6 outperforms X5680 by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Array
(
    [0] => Array
        (
            [_id] => 1352
            [filename] => Opteron-6386-SE
            [title] => AMD Opteron 6386 SE
            [manufacturer] => AMD
            [result] => 5.36
            [_number] => 1149
            [cores] => 16
            [custom_id] => 
        )

)

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1275 v6 and Xeon X5680 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking10711316
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.5710.42
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E3no data
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Release date28 March 2017 (7 years ago)14 February 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$339$172

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E3-1275 v6 has 78% better value for money than Xeon X5680.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1275 v6 and Xeon X5680 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.33 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplier38no data
L1 cache256 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data239 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data79 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,170 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1275 v6 and Xeon X5680 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA1366,LGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1275 v6 and Xeon X5680. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data40 Bit
StatusLaunchedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1275 v6 and Xeon X5680 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1275 v6 and Xeon X5680 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1275 v6 and Xeon X5680. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GB288 GB
Max memory channels23
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s32 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics P630no data
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1275 v6 and Xeon X5680 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1275 v6 and Xeon X5680 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1275 v6 and Xeon X5680 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1275 v6 and Xeon X5680.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1275 v6 6.01
+36%
Xeon X5680 4.42

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1275 v6 9303
+36.1%
Xeon X5680 6834

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E3-1275 v6 1503
+184%
Xeon X5680 530

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E3-1275 v6 4950
+100%
Xeon X5680 2473

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.01 4.42
Recency 28 March 2017 14 February 2010
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 8 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 130 Watt

Xeon E3-1275 v6 has a 36% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 78.1% lower power consumption.

Xeon X5680, on the other hand, has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

The Xeon E3-1275 v6 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5680 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1275 v6 and Xeon X5680, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1275 v6
Xeon E3-1275 v6
Intel Xeon X5680
Xeon X5680

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 23 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1275 v6 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 327 votes

Rate Xeon X5680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1275 v6 or Xeon X5680, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.