Ryzen 5 3400G vs Xeon E3-1275 v6

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon E3-1275 v6
2017
4 cores / 8 threads
6.01
+0.2%

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1275 v6 and Ryzen 5 3400G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking10121016
Place by popularitynot in top-10086
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.4716.45
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E3AMD Ryzen 5
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Picasso (2019−2020)
Release date28 March 2017 (7 years ago)7 July 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$339no data
Current price$459 (1.4x MSRP)$162

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 3400G has 268% better value for money than Xeon E3-1275 v6.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1275 v6 and Ryzen 5 3400G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus support8 GT/sno data
L1 cache256 KB128K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm12 nm
Die sizeno data210 mm2
Number of transistorsno data4,950 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1275 v6 and Ryzen 5 3400G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1151AM4
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1275 v6 and Ryzen 5 3400G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1275 v6 and Ryzen 5 3400G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1275 v6 and Ryzen 5 3400G are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1275 v6 and Ryzen 5 3400G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth37.5 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics P630AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1275 v6 and Ryzen 5 3400G integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1275 v6 and Ryzen 5 3400G integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1275 v6 and Ryzen 5 3400G integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1275 v6 and Ryzen 5 3400G.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1275 v6 6.01
+0.2%
Ryzen 5 3400G 6.00

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E3-1275 v6 9303
+0.3%
Ryzen 5 3400G 9279

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E3-1275 v6 1507
+33.7%
Ryzen 5 3400G 1127

Xeon E3-1275 v6 outperforms Ryzen 5 3400G by 34% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E3-1275 v6 4951
+37.1%
Ryzen 5 3400G 3612

Xeon E3-1275 v6 outperforms Ryzen 5 3400G by 37% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.01 6.00
Integrated graphics card 3.10 5.48
Recency 28 March 2017 7 July 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 65 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E3-1275 v6 and Ryzen 5 3400G.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1275 v6 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 3400G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1275 v6 and Ryzen 5 3400G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1275 v6
Xeon E3-1275 v6
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
Ryzen 5 3400G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 21 vote

Rate Xeon E3-1275 v6 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1978 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3400G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1275 v6 or Ryzen 5 3400G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.