EPYC 9654 vs Xeon E3-1265L v4

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon E3-1265L v4
2015
4 cores / 8 threads
4.50
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads
78.96
+1655%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v4 by 1655% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Xeon E3-1265L v4 and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking12254
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for moneyno data11.98
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameBroadwell-DT (2015)Genoa
Release date2 June 2015 (8 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,805
Current priceno data$3975 (0.3x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Technical specs

Xeon E3-1265L v4 and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)96
Threads8192
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size182 mm212x 72 mm2
Number of transistorsno data78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1265L v4 and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1150SP5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1265L v4 and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
eDRAM128 MBno data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Idle States+no data
FDI+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1265L v4 and EPYC 9654 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1265L v4 and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1265L v4 and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600, DDR3L-1866DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size32 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth29.8 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel Iris Pro P6300no data
Max video memory32 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data
Execution Units48no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1265L v4 and EPYC 9654 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1265L v4 and EPYC 9654.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1265L v4 4.50
EPYC 9654 78.96
+1655%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v4 by 1655% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E3-1265L v4 6954
EPYC 9654 122091
+1656%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v4 by 1656% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 4.50 78.96
Recency 2 June 2015 10 November 2022
Physical cores 4 96
Threads 8 192
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 360 Watt

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1265L v4 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1265L v4 and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1265L v4
Xeon E3-1265L v4
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 4 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1265L v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 978 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1265L v4 or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.