Ryzen 3 3300X vs Xeon E3-1265L v3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1265L v3
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
4.01
Ryzen 3 3300X
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
8.68
+116%

Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v3 by a whopping 116% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1265L v3 and Ryzen 3 3300X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1344817
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.8834.31
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Architecture codenameHaswell-WS (2013)Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
Release date2 June 2013 (11 years ago)24 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$710$120
Current price$102 (0.1x MSRP)$145 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 3 3300X has 784% better value for money than Xeon E3-1265L v3.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1265L v3 and Ryzen 3 3300X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache8192 KB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm7 nm
Die size160 mm274 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1265L v3 and Ryzen 3 3300X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150AM4
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1265L v3 and Ryzen 3 3300X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX286x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1265L v3 and Ryzen 3 3300X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1265L v3 and Ryzen 3 3300X are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1265L v3 and Ryzen 3 3300X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1265L v3 and Ryzen 3 3300X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1265L v3 and Ryzen 3 3300X.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1265L v3 4.01
Ryzen 3 3300X 8.68
+116%

Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v3 by 116% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E3-1265L v3 6204
Ryzen 3 3300X 13425
+116%

Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v3 by 116% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E3-1265L v3 1146
Ryzen 3 3300X 1659
+44.8%

Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v3 by 45% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E3-1265L v3 3481
Ryzen 3 3300X 5765
+65.6%

Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v3 by 66% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.01 8.68
Recency 2 June 2013 24 April 2020
Cost $710 $120
Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 65 Watt

The Ryzen 3 3300X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1265L v3 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1265L v3 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 3300X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1265L v3 and Ryzen 3 3300X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3
Xeon E3-1265L v3
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
Ryzen 3 3300X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 125 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1265L v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 1018 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3300X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1265L v3 or Ryzen 3 3300X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.