FX-9830P vs Xeon E3-1265L v2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1265L v2
2012
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
3.30
+54.2%

Xeon E3-1265L v2 outperforms FX-9830P by an impressive 54% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1265L v2 and FX-9830P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking15111787
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.08no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Bristol Ridge
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date14 May 2012 (12 years ago)1 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$142no data
Current price$91 (0.6x MSRP)$749

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1265L v2 and FX-9830P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nm28 nm
Die size160 mm2250 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1265L v2 and FX-9830P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1155no data
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt25-45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1265L v2 and FX-9830P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXDual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
FDI+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1265L v2 and FX-9830P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1265L v2 and FX-9830P are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1265L v2 and FX-9830P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size32.77 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 2500AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1265L v2 and FX-9830P integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1265L v2 and FX-9830P.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1265L v2 3.30
+54.2%
FX-9830P 2.14

Xeon E3-1265L v2 outperforms FX-9830P by 54% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E3-1265L v2 5108
+54.5%
FX-9830P 3307

Xeon E3-1265L v2 outperforms FX-9830P by 54% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E3-1265L v2 550
FX-9830P 609
+10.7%

FX-9830P outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 by 11% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E3-1265L v2 1834
+20.2%
FX-9830P 1526

Xeon E3-1265L v2 outperforms FX-9830P by 20% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.30 2.14
Integrated graphics card 0.68 1.95
Recency 14 May 2012 1 June 2016
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 25 Watt

The Xeon E3-1265L v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-9830P in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1265L v2 is a server/workstation processor while FX-9830P is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1265L v2 and FX-9830P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
Xeon E3-1265L v2
AMD FX-9830P
FX-9830P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 40 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1265L v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 108 votes

Rate FX-9830P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1265L v2 or FX-9830P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.