Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Xeon E3-1230 v2

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1230 v2
2012
4 cores / 8 threads, 69 Watt
3.90
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
18.38
+371%

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS outperforms Xeon E3-1230 v2 by a whopping 371% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1230 v2 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1439321
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.59no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency5.3538.65
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Hawk Point (2024)
Release date14 May 2012 (12 years ago)16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$360no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1230 v2 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm4 nm
Die size160 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature66 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1230 v2 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FP7
Power consumption (TDP)69 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1230 v2 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1230 v2 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1230 v2 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1230 v2 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size32.77 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1230 v2 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1230 v2 3.90
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS 18.38
+371%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1230 v2 6197
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS 29199
+371%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.90 18.38
Recency 14 May 2012 16 April 2024
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 22 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 69 Watt 45 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has a 371.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 450% more advanced lithography process, and 53.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1230 v2 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1230 v2 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1230 v2
Xeon E3-1230 v2
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 2708 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1230 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 13 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1230 v2 or Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.