Ryzen Z2 vs Xeon E-2378

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E-2378
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
10.89
+42.4%
Ryzen Z2
2025
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
7.65

Xeon E-2378 outperforms Ryzen Z2 by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7711031
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Power efficiency16.0526.17
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameRocket Lake-E (2021)Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025)
Release date8 September 2021 (3 years ago)6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E-2378 and Ryzen Z2 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)512 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)8 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E-2378 and Ryzen Z2 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1200FP7/FP7r2/FP8
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E-2378 and Ryzen Z2. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Xeon E-2378 and Ryzen Z2 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E-2378 and Ryzen Z2 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E-2378 and Ryzen Z2. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E-2378 and Ryzen Z2.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes44no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon E-2378 10.89
+42.4%
Ryzen Z2 7.65

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon E-2378 17472
+42.4%
Ryzen Z2 12270

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.89 7.65
Recency 8 September 2021 6 January 2025
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 28 Watt

Xeon E-2378 has a 42.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Ryzen Z2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 132.1% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon E-2378 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen Z2 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E-2378 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Z2 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E-2378
Xeon E-2378
AMD Ryzen Z2
Ryzen Z2

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 10 votes

Rate Xeon E-2378 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Z2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon E-2378 and Ryzen Z2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.