Mobile Sempron SI-42 vs Xeon E-2276M
Aggregate performance score
Xeon E-2276M outperforms Mobile Sempron SI-42 by a whopping 3277% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E-2276M and Mobile Sempron SI-42 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 971 | 3193 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 19.15 | no data |
Market segment | Server | Laptop |
Series | Intel Xeon E | AMD Mobile Sempron |
Power efficiency | 15.63 | 0.83 |
Architecture codename | Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) | Sable (2008−2009) |
Release date | 29 May 2019 (5 years ago) | 1 September 2009 (15 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $450 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon E-2276M and Mobile Sempron SI-42 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 12 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 4.7 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | 1800 MHz |
Multiplier | 28 | no data |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 12 MB (shared) | no data |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Die size | 154 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E-2276M and Mobile Sempron SI-42 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
Socket | FCBGA1440 | S1g2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E-2276M and Mobile Sempron SI-42. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | 65 nm, 1.075 - 1.125 |
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
vPro | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Speed Shift | + | no data |
My WiFi | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
TSX | + | - |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
SIPP | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon E-2276M and Mobile Sempron SI-42 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
MPX | + | - |
Identity Protection | + | - |
SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E-2276M and Mobile Sempron SI-42 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E-2276M and Mobile Sempron SI-42. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | no data |
Max video memory | 64 GB | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Clear Video | + | no data |
Clear Video HD | + | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 1.2 GHz | no data |
InTru 3D | + | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E-2276M and Mobile Sempron SI-42 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
DVI | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E-2276M and Mobile Sempron SI-42 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | + | no data |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@30Hz | no data |
Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | no data |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | no data |
Max resolution over VGA | N/A | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Xeon E-2276M and Mobile Sempron SI-42 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | 12 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.5 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E-2276M and Mobile Sempron SI-42.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 7.43 | 0.22 |
Recency | 29 May 2019 | 1 September 2009 |
Physical cores | 6 | 1 |
Threads | 12 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 25 Watt |
Xeon E-2276M has a 3277.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.
Mobile Sempron SI-42, on the other hand, has 80% lower power consumption.
The Xeon E-2276M is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Sempron SI-42 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon E-2276M is a server/workstation processor while Mobile Sempron SI-42 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E-2276M and Mobile Sempron SI-42, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.