Core i9-13900KS vs Xeon E-2276M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E-2276M
2019
6 cores / 12 threads, 45 Watt
7.62
Core i9-13900KS
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 150 Watt
40.00
+425%

Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon E-2276M by a whopping 425% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E-2276M and Core i9-13900KS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking89164
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation28.1387.16
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Eno data
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-H (2018−2019)Raptor Lake-S
Release date1 May 2019 (5 years ago)12 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$450no data
Current price$230 (0.5x MSRP)$526

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-13900KS has 210% better value for money than Xeon E-2276M.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E-2276M and Core i9-13900KS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads1232
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz5.8 GHz
L1 cache384 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size149.6 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E-2276M and Core i9-13900KS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1440FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E-2276M and Core i9-13900KS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon E-2276M and Core i9-13900KS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E-2276M and Core i9-13900KS are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E-2276M and Core i9-13900KS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth41.8 GB/s89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics P630Intel UHD Graphics 770
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHz1.65 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E-2276M and Core i9-13900KS integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E-2276M and Core i9-13900KS integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@30Hz4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E-2276M and Core i9-13900KS integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E-2276M and Core i9-13900KS.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E-2276M 7.62
i9-13900KS 40.00
+425%

Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon E-2276M by 425% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E-2276M 11782
i9-13900KS 61873
+425%

Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon E-2276M by 425% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E-2276M 1430
i9-13900KS 3108
+117%

Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon E-2276M by 117% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E-2276M 5319
i9-13900KS 21842
+311%

Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon E-2276M by 311% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.62 40.00
Recency 1 May 2019 12 January 2023
Physical cores 6 24
Threads 12 32
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 150 Watt

The Core i9-13900KS is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E-2276M in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E-2276M is a mobile workstation processor while Core i9-13900KS is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E-2276M and Core i9-13900KS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E-2276M
Xeon E-2276M
Intel Core i9-13900KS
Core i9-13900KS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 50 votes

Rate Xeon E-2276M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 791 vote

Rate Core i9-13900KS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E-2276M or Core i9-13900KS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.