Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon E-2186M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E-2186M
2018
6 cores / 12 threads, 45 Watt
7.50
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
14.59
+94.5%

Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Xeon E-2186M by an impressive 95% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E-2186M and Ryzen 7 3700X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking908465
Place by popularitynot in top-10098
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.4239.04
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon EAMD Ryzen 7
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-H (2018−2019)Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
Release date1 March 2018 (6 years ago)7 July 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$623$329
Current price$3048 (4.9x MSRP)$203 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 3700X has 2649% better value for money than Xeon E-2186M.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E-2186M and Ryzen 7 3700X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1216
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache384 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache12 MB32 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die size149 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data19,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E-2186M and Ryzen 7 3700X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGA-1440AM4
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E-2186M and Ryzen 7 3700X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E-2186M and Ryzen 7 3700X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E-2186M and Ryzen 7 3700X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E-2186M and Ryzen 7 3700X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size64 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth41.8 GB/s51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics P630-
Max video memory64 GB-
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHz-
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E-2186M and Ryzen 7 3700X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3-
eDP+-
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E-2186M and Ryzen 7 3700X integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+-
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@30Hz-
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz-
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hz-
Max resolution over VGAN/A-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E-2186M and Ryzen 7 3700X integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12-
OpenGL4.5-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E-2186M and Ryzen 7 3700X.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E-2186M 7.50
Ryzen 7 3700X 14.59
+94.5%

Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Xeon E-2186M by 95% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E-2186M 11595
Ryzen 7 3700X 22564
+94.6%

Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Xeon E-2186M by 95% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E-2186M 1373
Ryzen 7 3700X 1656
+20.6%

Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Xeon E-2186M by 21% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E-2186M 5230
Ryzen 7 3700X 8094
+54.8%

Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Xeon E-2186M by 55% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Xeon E-2186M 1098
Ryzen 7 3700X 2092
+90.5%

Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Xeon E-2186M by 91% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.50 14.59
Recency 1 March 2018 7 July 2019
Physical cores 6 8
Threads 12 16
Cost $623 $329
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 65 Watt

The Ryzen 7 3700X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E-2186M in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E-2186M is a mobile workstation processor while Ryzen 7 3700X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E-2186M and Ryzen 7 3700X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E-2186M
Xeon E-2186M
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 57 votes

Rate Xeon E-2186M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 4964 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 3700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E-2186M or Ryzen 7 3700X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.