Ryzen 5 7535HS vs Xeon D-2752TER

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon D-2752TER
2022
12 cores / 24 threads, 77 Watt
12.51
+3.8%

Xeon D-2752TER outperforms Ryzen 5 7535HS by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon D-2752TER and Ryzen 5 7535HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking623655
Place by popularitynot in top-10019
Cost-effectiveness evaluation24.89no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency14.7831.33
Architecture codenameIce Lake-D (2022−2023)Rembrandt-R (2023)
Release date24 February 2022 (2 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,061no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-2752TER and Ryzen 5 7535HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads2412
Base clock speed1.8 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz4.55 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm6 nm
Die sizeno data208 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-2752TER and Ryzen 5 7535HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA2579FP7
Power consumption (TDP)77 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-2752TER and Ryzen 5 7535HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
QuickAssist-no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
StatusLaunchedno data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon D-2752TER and Ryzen 5 7535HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-2752TER and Ryzen 5 7535HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-2752TER and Ryzen 5 7535HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon 660M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-2752TER and Ryzen 5 7535HS.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes3220
USB revision3.0no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports24no data
Number of USB ports4no data
Integrated LAN+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon D-2752TER 12.51
+3.8%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 12.05

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon D-2752TER 19102
+3.8%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 18394

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.51 12.05
Recency 24 February 2022 4 January 2023
Physical cores 12 6
Threads 24 12
Chip lithography 10 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 77 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon D-2752TER has a 3.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 5 7535HS, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 120% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon D-2752TER and Ryzen 5 7535HS.

Be aware that Xeon D-2752TER is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 7535HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-2752TER and Ryzen 5 7535HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-2752TER
Xeon D-2752TER
AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS
Ryzen 5 7535HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-2752TER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1217 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7535HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon D-2752TER or Ryzen 5 7535HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.