Ryzen 5 7535HS vs Xeon D-2712T
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 7535HS outperforms Xeon D-2712T by a whopping 124% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1447 | 876 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 21 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 7.73 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 2.96 | 12.30 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) | Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) |
| Release date | 24 February 2022 (3 years ago) | 4 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Xeon D-2712T and Ryzen 5 7535HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Performance-cores | 4 | no data |
| Threads | 8 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 4.55 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 15 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 6 nm |
| Die size | no data | 208 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon D-2712T and Ryzen 5 7535HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA2579 | FP7 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-2712T and Ryzen 5 7535HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX-512 | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| QuickAssist | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon D-2712T and Ryzen 5 7535HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| SGX | Yes with Intel® SPS | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-2712T and Ryzen 5 7535HS are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-2712T and Ryzen 5 7535HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5-4800 |
| Maximum memory size | 1 TB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | AMD Radeon 660M ( - 1900 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-2712T and Ryzen 5 7535HS.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 32 | 20 |
| USB revision | 3.0 | no data |
| Total number of SATA ports | 24 | no data |
| Number of USB ports | 4 | no data |
| Integrated LAN | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.53 | 10.13 |
| Recency | 24 February 2022 | 4 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 6 |
| Threads | 8 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Ryzen 5 7535HS has a 123.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon D-2712T in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon D-2712T is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 7535HS is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
