EPYC 4124P vs Xeon D-2187NT

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon D-2187NT
2018
16 cores / 32 threads, 110 Watt
11.38
EPYC 4124P
2024
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
11.73
+3.1%

EPYC 4124P outperforms Xeon D-2187NT by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon D-2187NT and EPYC 4124P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking696667
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.9352.71
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Dno data
Power efficiency9.7917.08
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date7 February 2018 (6 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,989$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 4124P has 969% better value for money than Xeon D-2187NT.

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-2187NT and EPYC 4124P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads328
Base clock speed2 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache1 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache16 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache22 MB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data71 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistorsno data6,570 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-2187NT and EPYC 4124P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA2518AM5
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-2187NT and EPYC 4124P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon D-2187NT and EPYC 4124P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-2187NT and EPYC 4124P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-2187NT and EPYC 4124P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size512 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-2187NT and EPYC 4124P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes3228

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon D-2187NT 11.38
EPYC 4124P 11.73
+3.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon D-2187NT 18070
EPYC 4124P 18637
+3.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.38 11.73
Recency 7 February 2018 21 May 2024
Physical cores 16 4
Threads 32 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon D-2187NT has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

EPYC 4124P, on the other hand, has a 3.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 69.2% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon D-2187NT and EPYC 4124P.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-2187NT and EPYC 4124P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-2187NT
Xeon D-2187NT
AMD EPYC 4124P
EPYC 4124P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Xeon D-2187NT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate EPYC 4124P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon D-2187NT or EPYC 4124P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.