Xeon D-2187NT vs E5-2650 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2650 v4
2016
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
8.86
Xeon D-2187NT
2018
16 cores / 32 threads, 110 Watt
11.81
+33.3%

Xeon D-2187NT outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v4 by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon D-2187NT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking881683
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.615.17
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Xeon D
Power efficiency7.699.79
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Skylake (server) (2017−2019)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)7 February 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,166$1,989

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon D-2187NT has 98% better value for money than Xeon E5-2650 v4.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon D-2187NT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads2432
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeQPIDMI 3.0
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier2220
L1 cache64 KB (per core)1 MB
L2 cache3 MB16 MB
L3 cache30 MB (shared)22 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size306.18 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature80 °Cno data
Number of transistors4700 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon D-2187NT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011FCBGA2518
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt110 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon D-2187NT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon D-2187NT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX-+
SGXno data-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon D-2187NT are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon D-2187NT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR4
Maximum memory size1.5 TB512 GB
Max memory channels44
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s85.33 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon D-2187NT.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4032

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2650 v4 8.86
Xeon D-2187NT 11.81
+33.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2650 v4 13563
Xeon D-2187NT 18070
+33.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.86 11.81
Recency 20 June 2016 7 February 2018
Physical cores 12 16
Threads 24 32
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 110 Watt

Xeon E5-2650 v4 has 4.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon D-2187NT, on the other hand, has a 33.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.

The Xeon D-2187NT is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2650 v4 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon D-2187NT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
Xeon E5-2650 v4
Intel Xeon D-2187NT
Xeon D-2187NT

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 1619 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2650 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Xeon D-2187NT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2650 v4 or Xeon D-2187NT, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.