Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ vs Xeon D-1540

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon D-1540
2015
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
6.31
+2154%
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
2003
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.28

Xeon D-1540 outperforms Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ by a whopping 2154% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon D-1540 and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10703131
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.84no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon DMobile Athlon 64
Power efficiency13.260.76
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Oakville (2003−2004)
Release date9 March 2015 (9 years ago)August 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$581no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-1540 and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads161
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rateno data800 MHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache64K (per core)128K
L2 cache256K (per core)512K
L3 cache1.5 MB (per core)no data
Chip lithography14 nmno data
Die size246.24 mm2193 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)80 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,200 million106 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-1540 and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1667754
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1540 and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
GPIO+no data

Security technologies

Xeon D-1540 and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1540 and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1540 and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR1
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.124 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1540 and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+.

PCIe version2.0/3.0no data
PCI Express lanes24no data
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports6no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN+no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon D-1540 6.31
+2154%
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ 0.28

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon D-1540 10025
+2128%
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ 450

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.31 0.28
Physical cores 8 1
Threads 16 1
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon D-1540 has a 2153.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+, on the other hand, has 28.6% lower power consumption.

The Xeon D-1540 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon D-1540 is a server/workstation processor while Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1540 and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-1540
Xeon D-1540
AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 5 votes

Rate Xeon D-1540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon D-1540 or Mobile Athlon 64 3000+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.