Opteron 6234 vs Xeon Bronze 3104

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Bronze 3104
2017, $213
6 cores / 6 threads, 85 Watt
2.49
+7.3%
Opteron 6234
2011, $377
12 cores / 12 threads, 115 Watt
2.32

Xeon Bronze 3104 outperforms Opteron 6234 by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19852029
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.440.21
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Bronzeno data
Power efficiency1.240.85
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Interlagos (2011−2012)
Release date11 July 2017 (8 years ago)14 November 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$213$377

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Bronze 3104 has 110% better value for money than Opteron 6234.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon Bronze 3104 and Opteron 6234 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads612
Base clock speed1.7 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier17no data
L1 cache384 KB768 KB
L2 cache6 MB2 MB (per module)
L3 cache8.25 MB8 MB (per die)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data2x 315 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data69 °C
Number of transistorsno data2,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Bronze 3104 and Opteron 6234 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)4
SocketFCLGA3647G34
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt115 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Bronze 3104 and Opteron 6234. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon Bronze 3104 and Opteron 6234 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Bronze 3104 and Opteron 6234 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Bronze 3104 and Opteron 6234. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2133DDR3
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth102.403 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Bronze 3104 and Opteron 6234.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon Bronze 3104 2.49
+7.3%
Opteron 6234 2.32

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon Bronze 3104 4367
+7.2%
Samples: 28
Opteron 6234 4072
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.49 2.32
Recency 11 July 2017 14 November 2011
Physical cores 6 12
Threads 6 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 115 Watt

Xeon Bronze 3104 has a 7.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 35.3% lower power consumption.

Opteron 6234, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Xeon Bronze 3104 and AMD Opteron 6234.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Bronze 3104
Xeon Bronze 3104
AMD Opteron 6234
Opteron 6234

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 16 votes

Rate Xeon Bronze 3104 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron 6234 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon Bronze 3104 and Opteron 6234, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.