EPYC 7402P vs Xeon 678X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon 678X
2026, $3,749
48 cores / 96 threads, 300 Watt
52.59
+111%
EPYC 7402P
2019, $1,250
24 cores / 48 threads, 180 Watt
24.92

Xeon 678X outperforms EPYC 7402P by a whopping 111% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking47264
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.1511.29
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency7.405.85
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelTSMC
Architecture codenameGranite Rapids (2024−2026)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date2 February 2026 (recently)7 August 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,749$1,250

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon 678X has 16% better value for money than EPYC 7402P.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon 678X and EPYC 7402P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores48 (Octatetraconta-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Performance-cores48no data
Threads9648
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.9 GHz3.35 GHz
Bus rate0 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data28
L1 cache112 KB (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache192 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 3 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size2x 598 mm2192 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)82 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 678X and EPYC 7402P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA4710SP3
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 678X and EPYC 7402P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon 678X and EPYC 7402P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 678X and EPYC 7402P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 678X and EPYC 7402P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5(6400MT/s)MRDIMM(8000MT/s)DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size4 TB4 TiB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 678X and EPYC 7402P.

PCIe version5.04.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon 678X 52.59
+111%
EPYC 7402P 24.92

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon 678X 92125
+111%
Samples: 1
EPYC 7402P 43648
Samples: 40

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 52.59 24.92
Recency 2 February 2026 7 August 2019
Physical cores 48 24
Threads 96 48
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 180 Watt

Xeon 678X has a 111% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

EPYC 7402P, on the other hand, has 66.7% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon 678X is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD EPYC 7402P in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 678X
Xeon 678X
AMD EPYC 7402P
EPYC 7402P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 678X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 12 votes

Rate EPYC 7402P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon 678X and EPYC 7402P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.