Athlon X4 970 vs Xeon 6741P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon 6741P
2025
48 cores / 96 threads, 300 Watt
57.27
+3718%

Xeon 6741P outperforms Athlon X4 970 by a whopping 3718% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking292303
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency8.070.98
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenameno dataBristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date1 January 2025 (less than a year ago)27 July 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon 6741P and Athlon X4 970 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores48 (Octatetraconta-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads964
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data512 KB (per core)
L3 cache288 MB0 KB
Chip lithographyIntel 3 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data246 mm2
Maximum core temperature79 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 6741P and Athlon X4 970 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCLGA4710AM4
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 6741P and Athlon X4 970. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX-+
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon 6741P and Athlon X4 970 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGX+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 6741P and Athlon X4 970 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 6741P and Athlon X4 970. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5(6400MT/s)DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 6741P and Athlon X4 970.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes136no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon 6741P 57.27
+3718%
Athlon X4 970 1.50

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon 6741P 100660
+3707%
Samples: 1
Athlon X4 970 2644
Samples: 5

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 57.27 1.50
Recency 1 January 2025 27 July 2017
Physical cores 48 4
Threads 96 4
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon 6741P has a 3718% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads.

Athlon X4 970, on the other hand, has 361.5% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon 6741P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon X4 970 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon 6741P is a server/workstation processor while Athlon X4 970 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 6741P
Xeon 6741P
AMD Athlon X4 970
Athlon X4 970

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6741P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 127 votes

Rate Athlon X4 970 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon 6741P and Athlon X4 970, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.