Xeon LC3518 vs 6710E
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 117 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 13.03 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 7.21 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Sierra Forest (2024) | Jasper Forest (2010) |
| Release date | 3 June 2024 (1 year ago) | 11 February 2010 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,749 | $192 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Xeon 6710E and Xeon LC3518 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 64 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.73 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB (per module) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 96 MB (shared) | 2 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | Intel 3 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 85 °C | 95 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon 6710E and Xeon LC3518 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA4710 | 1366 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 205 Watt | 23 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 6710E and Xeon LC3518. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon 6710E and Xeon LC3518 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| SGX | + | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 6710E and Xeon LC3518 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 6710E and Xeon LC3518. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-6400 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 6710E and Xeon LC3518.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 88 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 3 June 2024 | 11 February 2010 |
| Physical cores | 64 | 1 |
| Threads | 64 | 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 205 Watt | 23 Watt |
Xeon 6710E has an age advantage of 14 years, and 6300% more physical cores and 6300% more threads.
Xeon LC3518, on the other hand, has 791.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon 6710E and Intel Xeon LC3518. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
