Ryzen 5 230 vs Xeon 6710E
Primary details
Comparing Xeon 6710E and Ryzen 5 230 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Architecture codename | Sierra Forest (2024) | Hawk Point (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 3 June 2024 (less than a year ago) | 6 January 2025 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,749 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Xeon 6710E and Ryzen 5 230 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 64 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB (per module) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 96 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 85 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 25,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon 6710E and Ryzen 5 230 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | 4710 | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 205 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 6710E and Ryzen 5 230. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon 6710E and Ryzen 5 230 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 6710E and Ryzen 5 230 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 6710E and Ryzen 5 230. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | AMD Radeon 760M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 6710E and Ryzen 5 230.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 88 | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 3 June 2024 | 6 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 64 | 6 |
| Threads | 64 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 205 Watt | 28 Watt |
Xeon 6710E has 966.7% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads.
Ryzen 5 230, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 632.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon 6710E and Ryzen 5 230. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon 6710E is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 230 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 6710E and Ryzen 5 230, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
