Ryzen 3 210 vs Xeon 6710E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon 6710E
2024
64 cores / 64 threads, 205 Watt
34.95
+366%

Xeon 6710E outperforms Ryzen 3 210 by a whopping 366% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1071078
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.96no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency7.2011.31
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelTSMC
Architecture codenameSierra Forest (2024)Hawk Point (2024−2025)
Release date3 June 2024 (1 year ago)6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,749no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon 6710E and Ryzen 3 210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads648
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cache96 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (per module)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache96 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 3 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data137 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)85 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data20,900 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 6710E and Ryzen 3 210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA4710FP7
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 6710E and Ryzen 3 210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon 6710E and Ryzen 3 210 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 6710E and Ryzen 3 210 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 6710E and Ryzen 3 210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-6400DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon 740M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 6710E and Ryzen 3 210.

PCIe version5.04.0
PCI Express lanes8814

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon 6710E 34.95
+366%
Ryzen 3 210 7.50

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon 6710E Samples: 1 61404
+366%
Ryzen 3 210 Samples: 34 13180

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.95 7.50
Recency 3 June 2024 6 January 2025
Physical cores 64 4
Threads 64 8
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 28 Watt

Xeon 6710E has a 366% higher aggregate performance score, and 1500% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Ryzen 3 210, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and 632.1% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon 6710E is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 3 210 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon 6710E is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 210 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 6710E
Xeon 6710E
AMD Ryzen 3 210
Ryzen 3 210

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Xeon 6710E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon 6710E and Ryzen 3 210, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.