EPYC 74F3 vs Xeon 654

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon 654
2026, $1,199
18 cores / 36 threads, 200 Watt
35.02
+1.1%
EPYC 74F3
2021, $2,900
24 cores / 48 threads, 240 Watt
34.63

Xeon 654 outperforms EPYC 74F3 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking129131
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation33.6710.90
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency7.396.09
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelTSMC
Architecture codenameGranite Rapids (2024−2026)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date2 February 2026 (recently)15 March 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199$2,900

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon 654 has 209% better value for money than EPYC 74F3.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon 654 and EPYC 74F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Performance-cores18no data
Threads3648
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz4 GHz
Bus rate0 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data32
L1 cache112 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache72 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 3 nm7 nm+
Die size2x 598 mm24x 81 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 654 and EPYC 74F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA4710SP3
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 654 and EPYC 74F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon 654 and EPYC 74F3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 654 and EPYC 74F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 654 and EPYC 74F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5(6400MT/s)DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TB4 TiB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 654 and EPYC 74F3.

PCIe version5.04.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon 654 35.02
+1.1%
EPYC 74F3 34.63

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon 654 61351
+1.1%
Samples: 1
EPYC 74F3 60666
Samples: 17

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.02 34.63
Recency 2 February 2026 15 March 2021
Physical cores 18 24
Threads 36 48
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 240 Watt

Xeon 654 has a 1.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and 20% lower power consumption.

EPYC 74F3, on the other hand, has 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Xeon 654 and AMD EPYC 74F3.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 654
Xeon 654
AMD EPYC 74F3
EPYC 74F3

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 4 votes

Rate EPYC 74F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon 654 and EPYC 74F3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.