Ryzen 7 PRO 250 vs Xeon 6369P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon 6369P
2025
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
18.46
+42.3%
Ryzen 7 PRO 250
2025
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
12.97

Xeon 6369P outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 250 by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking372650
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation77.06no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Power efficiency18.7344.65
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-R (2023−2025)Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025)
Release date24 February 2025 (less than a year ago)6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$606no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon 6369P and Ryzen 7 PRO 250 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed5.7 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)512 KB
L2 cache2 MB (per core)8 MB
L3 cache24 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography10 nm4 nm
Die size257 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 6369P and Ryzen 7 PRO 250 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket1700FP8
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 6369P and Ryzen 7 PRO 250. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, Ryzen AI (16 TOPS), AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Security technologies

Xeon 6369P and Ryzen 7 PRO 250 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 6369P and Ryzen 7 PRO 250 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 6369P and Ryzen 7 PRO 250. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 6369P and Ryzen 7 PRO 250.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon 6369P 18.46
+42.3%
Ryzen 7 PRO 250 12.97

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon 6369P 29680
+42.3%
Ryzen 7 PRO 250 20856

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.46 12.97
Recency 24 February 2025 6 January 2025
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 28 Watt

Xeon 6369P has a 42.3% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 month.

Ryzen 7 PRO 250, on the other hand, has a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 239.3% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon 6369P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 250 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon 6369P is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 PRO 250 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 6369P
Xeon 6369P
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 250
Ryzen 7 PRO 250

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6369P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon 6369P and Ryzen 7 PRO 250, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.