Opteron 248 vs Xeon 5160

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon 5160
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 80 Watt
0.61
+103%
Opteron 248
2003
1 core / 1 thread, 89 Watt
0.30

Xeon 5160 outperforms Opteron 248 by a whopping 103% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon 5160 and Opteron 248 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28043117
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.15no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency0.720.32
Architecture codenameWoodcrest (2006)SledgeHammer (2003−2005)
Release dateJune 2006 (18 years ago)November 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$22$12

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon 5160 and Opteron 248 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cache0 KB128 KB
L2 cache4 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm130 nm
Die sizeno data193 mm2
Maximum core temperature65 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data106 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeB2=1.0V-1.5V, G0=.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 5160 and Opteron 248 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketLGA771940
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 5160 and Opteron 248. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity+no data

Security technologies

Xeon 5160 and Opteron 248 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 5160 and Opteron 248 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 5160 and Opteron 248. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon 5160 0.61
+103%
Opteron 248 0.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon 5160 963
+102%
Opteron 248 476

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.61 0.30
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 89 Watt

Xeon 5160 has a 103.3% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 11.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon 5160 is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 248 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 5160 and Opteron 248, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 5160
Xeon 5160
AMD Opteron 248
Opteron 248

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 8 votes

Rate Xeon 5160 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron 248 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon 5160 or Opteron 248, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.