Xeon 5148 vs E1-2500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E1-2500
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.34
Xeon 5148
2006, $9
2 cores / 2 threads, 40 Watt
0.43
+26.5%

Xeon 5148 outperforms E1-2500 by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33573252
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.05
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Power efficiency0.960.45
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Woodcrest (2006)
Release date23 May 2013 (12 years ago)June 2006 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$9

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

E1-2500 and Xeon 5148 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz2.33 GHz
L1 cacheno data0 KB
L2 cache1024 KB4 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm65 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E1-2500 and Xeon 5148 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT3771
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt40 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-2500 and Xeon 5148. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-2500 and Xeon 5148 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-2500 and Xeon 5148. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8240no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E1-2500 and Xeon 5148 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E1-2500 and Xeon 5148 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-2500 and Xeon 5148.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

E1-2500 0.34
Xeon 5148 0.43
+26.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

E1-2500 593
Samples: 367
Xeon 5148 747
+26%
Samples: 5

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 0.43
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 40 Watt

E1-2500 has a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 166.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon 5148, on the other hand, has a 26.5% higher aggregate performance score.

The Intel Xeon 5148 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD E1-2500 in performance tests.

Be aware that E1-2500 is a notebook processor while Xeon 5148 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E1-2500
E1-2500
Intel Xeon 5148
Xeon 5148

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 126 votes

Rate E1-2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Xeon 5148 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors E1-2500 and Xeon 5148, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.