A4-3400 vs Xeon 5140

Primary details

Comparing Xeon 5140 and A4-3400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	2724	2615
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.27	5.85
Market segment	Server	Desktop processor
Architecture codename	Woodcrest (2006)	Llano (2011−2012)
Release date	June 2006 (18 years ago)	7 September 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$15	no data
Current price	$40 (2.7x MSRP)	$13.09

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

A4-3400 has 37% better value for money than Xeon 5140.

Detailed specifications

Xeon 5140 and A4-3400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	2	2
Base clock speed	2.33 GHz	2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.33 GHz	2.7 GHz
L1 cache	0 KB	128 KB (per core)
L2 cache	4 MB	512 KB (per core)
L3 cache	0 KB	0 KB
Chip lithography	65 nm	32 nm
Die size	no data	228 mm2
Maximum core temperature	65 °C	no data
Number of transistors	no data	1,178 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No
VID voltage range	B2=1.0V-1.5V, G0=.85V-1.5V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 5140 and A4-3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	LGA771	FM1
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 5140 and A4-3400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
FSB parity	+	no data
Status	Discontinued	no data

Security technologies

Xeon 5140 and A4-3400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 5140 and A4-3400 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	no data	+
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	-	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 5140 and A4-3400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR2

DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

Radeon HD 6410D

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-3400 outperforms Xeon 5140 by 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	0.55	0.70
Chip lithography	65 nm	32 nm

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 5140 and A4-3400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---