Xeon W-3275M vs 5110

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon 5110 and Xeon W-3275M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated171
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.52
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon W
Architecture codenameWoodcrest (2006)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release dateJune 2006 (18 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$20$7,453
Current price$43 (2.2x MSRP)$9030 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon 5110 and Xeon W-3275M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads256
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus supportno data4 × 8 GT/s
L1 cache0 KB1.75 MB
L2 cache4 MB28 MB
L3 cache0 KB38.5 MB
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature65 °C76 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage rangeB2=1.0V-1.5V, G0=.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 5110 and Xeon W-3275M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketLGA771FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 5110 and Xeon W-3275M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSXno data+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FSB parity+no data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon 5110 and Xeon W-3275M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 5110 and Xeon W-3275M are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPT-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 5110 and Xeon W-3275M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidthno data140.8 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 5110 and Xeon W-3275M.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon 5110 405
Xeon W-3275M 39834
+9736%

W-3275M outperforms 5110 by 9736% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 28
Threads 2 56
Cost $20 $7453
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 205 Watt

We couldn't decide between Xeon 5110 and Xeon W-3275M. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 5110 and Xeon W-3275M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 5110
Xeon 5110
Intel Xeon W-3275M
Xeon W-3275M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 26 votes

Rate Xeon 5110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 62 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon 5110 or Xeon W-3275M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.