EPYC 9654 vs Xeon 5110

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon 5110
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.25
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
75.73
+30192%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon 5110 by a whopping 30192% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon 5110 and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31456
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.29
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency0.3619.91
Architecture codenameWoodcrest (2006)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release dateJune 2006 (18 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$20$11,805

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon 5110 and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)96
Threads2192
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplierno data24
L1 cache0 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data12x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature65 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage rangeB2=1.0V-1.5V, G0=.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 5110 and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketLGA771SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 5110 and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon 5110 and EPYC 9654 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 5110 and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 5110 and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 5110 and EPYC 9654.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon 5110 0.25
EPYC 9654 75.73
+30192%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon 5110 405
EPYC 9654 120295
+29602%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.25 75.73
Physical cores 2 96
Threads 2 192
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 360 Watt

Xeon 5110 has 453.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9654, on the other hand, has a 30192% higher aggregate performance score, 4700% more physical cores and 9500% more threads, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon 5110 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 5110 and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 5110
Xeon 5110
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 26 votes

Rate Xeon 5110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 995 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon 5110 or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.