Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 vs Xeon 3.20
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3395 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) |
| Power efficiency | 0.30 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Gallatin (2003−2004) | Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) |
| Release date | October 2003 (22 years ago) | 4 June 2024 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon 3.20 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 24 |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 8 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 36 MB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | 237 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 286 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon 3.20 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | 604 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 97 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 3.20 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XDNA 2 NPU |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 12 |
| Threads | 1 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 97 Watt | 55 Watt |
Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 has 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, a 4233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 76.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon 3.20 and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon 3.20 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
