A6-9500E vs Xeon 3.20

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon 3.20
2003
1 core / 1 thread, 97 Watt
0.27

A6-9500E outperforms Xeon 3.20 by a whopping 267% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking34222722
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.121.19
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenameGallatin (2003−2004)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release dateOctober 2003 (22 years ago)27 July 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon 3.20 and A6-9500E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache8 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB1024 KB
L3 cache2 MB0 KB
Chip lithography130 nm28 nm
Die size237 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors286 million1,178 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 3.20 and A6-9500E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
Socket604AM4
Power consumption (TDP)97 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 3.20 and A6-9500E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
PowerTune-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 3.20 and A6-9500E are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 3.20 and A6-9500E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2400
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data4
Enduro-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon 3.20 and A6-9500E integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon 3.20 and A6-9500E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 3.20 and A6-9500E.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon 3.20 0.27
A6-9500E 0.99
+267%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon 3.20 478
Samples: 11
A6-9500E 1741
+264%
Samples: 11

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.27 0.99
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 130 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 97 Watt 35 Watt

A6-9500E has a 266.7% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 177.1% lower power consumption.

The AMD A6-9500E is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon 3.20 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon 3.20 is a server/workstation processor while A6-9500E is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 3.20
Xeon 3.20
AMD A6-9500E
A6-9500E

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 6 votes

Rate Xeon 3.20 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 53 votes

Rate A6-9500E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon 3.20 and A6-9500E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.