EPYC 9825 vs VIA Nano U2250

VS

Primary details

Comparing VIA Nano U2250 and EPYC 9825 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3366not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesVIA Nanono data
Power efficiency1.04no data
Architecture codenameIsaiah (2009)Turin (2024)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$13,006

Detailed specifications

VIA Nano U2250 and EPYC 9825 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)144
Threads1288
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm3 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on VIA Nano U2250 and EPYC 9825 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketNanoBGA2SP5
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt390 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by VIA Nano U2250 and EPYC 9825. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by VIA Nano U2250 and EPYC 9825 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by VIA Nano U2250 and EPYC 9825. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by VIA Nano U2250 and EPYC 9825.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2009 10 October 2024
Physical cores 1 144
Threads 1 288
Chip lithography 65 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 390 Watt

VIA Nano U2250 has 3800% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9825, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, 14300% more physical cores and 28700% more threads, and a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between VIA Nano U2250 and EPYC 9825. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that VIA Nano U2250 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9825 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between VIA Nano U2250 and EPYC 9825, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


VIA Nano U2250
Nano U2250
AMD EPYC 9825
EPYC 9825

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 22 votes

Rate VIA Nano U2250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9825 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about VIA Nano U2250 or EPYC 9825, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.