Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
Aggregate performance score
Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) outperforms VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 by a whopping 566% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2934 | 1628 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | VIA | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.62 | 3.12 |
| Architecture codename | CNQ (2011) | Thuban (2010) |
| Release date | 17 May 2011 (13 years ago) | 1 May 2010 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 6 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.46 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1333 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 132 mm2 | 346 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 904 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA | AM3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27.5 Watt | 95 Watt |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W).
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.47 | 3.13 |
| Recency | 17 May 2011 | 1 May 2010 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 6 |
| Threads | 4 | 6 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 95 Watt |
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 12.5% more advanced lithography process, and 251.9% lower power consumption.
Phenom II X6 1055T (95W), on the other hand, has a 566% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.
The Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) is our recommended choice as it beats the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 in performance tests.
Be aware that VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 is a notebook processor while Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
