E2-1800 vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700

VS

Aggregate performance score

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 27 Watt
0.47
+67.9%
E2-1800
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.28

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 outperforms E2-1800 by an impressive 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and E2-1800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29323132
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesVIAAMD E-Series
Power efficiency1.621.47
Architecture codenameCNQ (2011)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release date17 May 2011 (13 years ago)6 June 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and E2-1800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.46 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache512 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography40 nm40 nm
Die size132 mm275 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and E2-1800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGAFT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)27.5 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and E2-1800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
PowerNow-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and E2-1800 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and E2-1800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 7340

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 0.47
+67.9%
E2-1800 0.28

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 1615
+49.2%
E2-1800 1083

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.47 0.28
Recency 17 May 2011 6 June 2012
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 18 Watt

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 has a 67.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

E2-1800, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 50% lower power consumption.

The VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-1800 in performance tests.

Be aware that VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 is a notebook processor while E2-1800 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and E2-1800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
Nano QuadCore L4700
AMD E2-1800
E2-1800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 166 votes

Rate E2-1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 or E2-1800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.