Athlon II X4 605e vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
Aggregate performance score
Athlon II X4 605e outperforms Nano QuadCore L4700 by a whopping 164% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3192 | 2583 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.18 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | VIA | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.64 | 1.05 |
| Designer | VIA | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | CNQ (2011) | Propus (2009−2011) |
| Release date | 12 May 2011 (14 years ago) | 20 October 2009 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $102 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Athlon II X4 605e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.47 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1333 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 2x 66 mm2 | 169 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 300 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Athlon II X4 605e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | VIA nanoBGA2 | AM3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Athlon II X4 605e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Athlon II X4 605e are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Athlon II X4 605e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Athlon II X4 605e.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.42 | 1.11 |
| Recency | 12 May 2011 | 20 October 2009 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 45 Watt |
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 12.5% more advanced lithography process, and 60.7% lower power consumption.
Athlon II X4 605e, on the other hand, has a 164.3% higher aggregate performance score.
The AMD Athlon II X4 605e is our recommended choice as it beats the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 in performance tests.
Be aware that VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 is a notebook processor while Athlon II X4 605e is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
