VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 vs Athlon II X4 640

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II X4 640
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.29
+207%
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 28 Watt
0.42

Athlon II X4 640 outperforms Nano QuadCore L4700 by a whopping 207% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24463179
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.92no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataVIA
Power efficiency0.580.64
DesignerAMDVIA
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenamePropus (2009−2011)CNQ (2011)
Release date11 May 2010 (15 years ago)12 May 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X4 640 and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.47 GHz
Bus rateno data1333 MHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm40 nm
Die size169 mm22x 66 mm2
Number of transistors300 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X4 640 and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3VIA nanoBGA2
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X4 640 and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X4 640 and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X4 640 and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X4 640 and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700.

PCIe version2.0no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.29 0.42
Recency 11 May 2010 12 May 2011
Chip lithography 45 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 28 Watt

Athlon II X4 640 has a 207.1% higher aggregate performance score.

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 12.5% more advanced lithography process, and 239.3% lower power consumption.

The AMD Athlon II X4 640 is our recommended choice as it beats the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 in performance tests.

Note that Athlon II X4 640 is a desktop processor while VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X4 640
Athlon II X4 640
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
Nano QuadCore L4700

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 1528 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 5 votes

Rate VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Athlon II X4 640 and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.